Institution | Student |
First-Year (N=320,566) |
Senior (N=387,634) |
Institutions1 |
Athletic Affiliation2 | ||||
NCAA Division I | 38% | 42% | 22% | |
NCAA Division II | 15% | 16% | 20% | |
NCAA Division III | 17% | 15% | 26% | |
National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics | 6% | 6% | 13% | |
Data not available | 25% | 20% | 19% | |
Barron's Profile of American Colleges Selectivity Index2 | ||||
Noncompetitive | 2% | 3% | 4% | |
Less competitive | 6% | 7% | 9% | |
Competitive | 34% | 38% | 41% | |
Very Competitive | 20% | 21% | 18% | |
Highly to Most Competitive | 12% | 11% | 10% | |
Data not available | 25% | 20% | 19% | |
Carnegie 2010 Basic Classification2 | ||||
Research Universities (very high research activity) | 14% | 15% | 5% | |
Research Universities (high research activity) | 11% | 14% | 7% | |
Doctoral/Research Universities | 5% | 6% | 5% | |
Master's Colleges and Universities (larger programs) | 25% | 27% | 25% | |
Master's Colleges and Universities (medium programs) | 7% | 7% | 10% | |
Master's Colleges and Universities (smaller programs) | 3% | 3% | 6% | |
Baccalaureate Colleges—Arts & Sciences | 8% | 6% | 14% | |
Baccalaureate Colleges—Diverse Fields | 7% | 6% | 16% | |
Other | 2% | 2% | 5% | |
Data not available | 19% | 13% | 7% | |
Control | ||||
Public | 68% | 70% | 44% | |
Private | 32% | 30% | 56% | |
Enrollment Size (total undergraduate enrollment) | ||||
Small (fewer than 2,500) | 16% | 14% | 42% | |
Medium (2,500-4,999) | 16% | 14% | 22% | |
Large (5,000-9,999) | 18% | 18% | 17% | |
Very large (10,000 or more) | 50% | 54% | 20% | |
Data not available | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
Locale2 | ||||
City | 44% | 50% | 45% | |
Suburban | 15% | 15% | 19% | |
Town | 16% | 16% | 21% | |
Rural | 5% | 5% | 8% | |
Data not available | 19% | 14% | 7% | |
Minority-Serving Institution2 | ||||
Not a minority-serving institution | 78% | 83% | 86% | |
Historically black colleges and universities | 2% | 1% | 4% | |
Hispanic-serving institution | 1% | 2% | 2% | |
Tribal college or university | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
Other minority-serving institution | 0% | 0% | 1% | |
Data not available | 19% | 13% | 7% | |
U.S. Region and Canada | ||||
New England | 6% | 5% | 8% | |
Mid East | 15% | 14% | 18% | |
Great Lakes | 15% | 15% | 15% | |
Plains | 8% | 8% | 10% | |
Southeast | 21% | 21% | 24% | |
Southwest | 5% | 8% | 6% | |
Rocky Mountains | 3% | 4% | 3% | |
Far West | 8% | 10% | 8% | |
Outlying Areas | 0% | 0% | 1% | |
Canada | 19% | 13% | 7% |
1 About 1,100 institutions are included in the data. The precise number is not reported to prevent estimation of an individual institution’s results. |
2 Not available for Canadian institutions |
First-Year (N=309,184) |
Senior (N=393,688) |
Age2 | |||
19 or younger | 71% | 0% | |
20 through 23 | 8% | 58% | |
24 through 29 | 3% | 15% | |
30 through 39 | 2% | 9% | |
40 through 55 | 2% | 7% | |
Over 55 | 0% | 1% | |
Missing | 14% | 10% | |
Distance education status2 | |||
No | 83% | 83% | |
Yes | 3% | 6% | |
Missing | 14% | 11% | |
Enrollment status1 | |||
Part-time | 6% | 16% | |
Full-time | 94% | 84% | |
First-generation student2 | |||
No | 49% | 49% | |
Yes | 36% | 40% | |
Missing | 15% | 11% | |
Gender1 | |||
Male | 35% | 37% | |
Female | 65% | 63% | |
Grades2 | |||
Mostly A's | 36% | 43% | |
Mostly B's | 40% | 42% | |
Mostly C's or lower | 10% | 5% | |
Missing | 14% | 10% | |
Major field category2 | |||
Arts and Humanities | 11% | 13% | |
Biological Sciences | 9% | 7% | |
Business | 11% | 16% | |
Education | 6% | 7% | |
Engineering | 6% | 6% | |
Physical Sciences | 3% | 3% | |
Other Professional | 10% | 9% | |
Social Sciences | 11% | 14% | |
Other | 12% | 13% | |
Undecided | 3% | 0% | |
Missing | 18% | 12% | |
Race or ethnicity1 | |||
African American/Black | 6% | 6% | |
American Indian/Alaska Native | 1% | 1% | |
Asian/Pacific Islander | 3% | 3% | |
Caucasian/White | 45% | 52% | |
Hispanic | 5% | 5% | |
Other | 1% | 1% | |
Foreign | 4% | 4% | |
Multi-racial/ethnic | 2% | 2% | |
Unknown | 3% | 5% | |
Missing | 31% | 22% | |
Residence status2 | |||
Dormitory or other campus housing | 52% | 12% | |
Residence within walking distance | 7% | 22% | |
Residence within driving distance | 23% | 47% | |
Fraternity or sorority house | 0% | 1% | |
None of the above | 4% | 7% | |
Missing | 14% | 10% | |
Student-athlete status2 | |||
No | 78% | 85% | |
Yes | 8% | 5% | |
Missing | 14% | 10% |
1 Institution-reported |
2 Student-reported |
Here are all the tips, suggestions, and notes to help you make the most of the NSSE Report Builder:
To represent the multi-dimensional nature of student engagement at national, sector, institutional, and intra-institutional levels, NSSE developed five Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice.
To learn more, click on an Benchmark below.
Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice |
---|
Level of Academic Challenge Active and Collaborative Learning Student-Faculty Interaction Enriching Educational Experiences Supportive Campus Environment |
Level of Academic Challenge
Challenging intellectual and creative work is central to student learning and collegiate quality. Colleges and universities promote high levels of student achievement by emphasizing the importance of academic effort and setting high expectations for student performance. Items include:
Active and Collaborative Learning
Students learn more when they are intensely involved in their education and asked to think about what they are learning in different settings. Collaborating with others in solving problems or mastering difficult material prepares students for the messy, unscripted problems they will encounter daily during and after college. Items include:
Student-Faculty Interaction
Students learn firsthand how experts think about and solve practical problems by interacting with faculty members inside and outside the classroom. As a result, their teachers become role models, mentors, and guides for continuous, life-long learning. Items include:
Enriching Educational Experiences
Complementary learning opportunities enhance academic programs. Diversity experiences teach students valuable things about themselves and others. Technology facilitates collaboration between peers and instructors. Internships, community service, and senior capstone courses provide opportunities to integrate and apply knowledge. Items include:
Supportive Campus Environment
Students perform better and are more satisfied at colleges that are committed to their success and cultivate positive working and social relations among different groups on campus. Items include: